Sign up for our Ballot Patch and Issues Notification list by clicking here.
These pages are best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.x with a screen resolution of 1024 x 768. While this is intended to work with all browsers, there are currently some issues with Netscape which we are continually trying to resolve.
Link to Downloads Page
Allows for the download of various ballot segments or the entire ballot site in various formats.
HL7® Version 3 Standard, © 2002-2004 Health Level Seven ®, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven, Inc. Reg. U.S. Pat & TM Off
Reproduction of this material in any form is strictly forbidden without the written permission of the publisher.
Ann Arbor, MI August 2004
Dear Member,
The HL7 Board of Directors is pleased to offer you the HL7 Version 3 Messaging committee and membership level ballots, and to solicit your feedback. In this ballot you will find changes many elements that are now normative HL7 standards, thanks in major measure to the constructive critque you provided in previous ballot cycles. For those areas still undergoing ballot, you will find that many areas have been changed, again, based on the feedback that you provided in the previous ballot. Please help us by providing another thorough, honest review.For those of you who may not have reviewed the previous ballots, a more detailed description of this ballot follows Sincerely,
The HL7 Board
We started the Version 3 effort years ago based on the principles of modeling and technology-neutrality. We believe that this approach will make the work of HL7 "future proof", i.e., able to respond to changes in requirements and technology without loss of existing work. This project has taken longer than we imagined, but we have finally reached a release where the majority of the material is already a standard. This was the result of intense and protracted effort of hundreds of volunteers, many of whom have worked so far beyond the call of duty that we can't possibly thank them enough.
Now it is Your Turn to Help
Responding to this ballot will take some study to understand the new approach. In exchange for that effort we are sure that you will appreciate the strategic benefits. We are equally sure that you will draw from your own experience to suggest improvements and we eagerly solicit your comments. For this round we are concerned with your comments and with your vote. This is another opportunity for our members to participate in the process and we eagerly await the opportunity to fold your comments into any subsequent ballots.
Update Notification List
To keep you continually apprised of any updates or patches to this ballot site, we have instituted a special list service to which you may subscribe. You can only sign up through this web page by clicking here. Only HL7 staff are permitted to post messages. This ensures that the list is used to distribute information about what has been updated. It is not intended to provide a forum for discussion. Discussion regarding the ballot publishing may be hosted on the Editors list.Why Version 3?
Healthcare costs evermore dominate national economies, and Draconian measures to control cost have hampered provider effectiveness and impacted citizen satisfaction and safety. Information Technology (IT) has helped, and is on the verge of being able to help much more. Version 3 will be a key part of the contribution of IT to healthcare's reaching new levels of- effective and cost-efficient patient care decisions
- safety and cost savings that come from "doing it right," in the sense of preventing avoidable errors
- the aggregation of health information for evidence-based medicine and data-based policy
Many general IT advances create the foundation for this new capability. These include:
- The exponential increase of processing and storage capacity described by Moore's law
- Enhancements in user interfaces such as voice entry and smarter programs that apply knowledge to limiting required information input
- An increasing variety of devices for personal access to, and collection of information at the point of care and at points far distant from the point of care
- The build-out of the Internet and related standards to create a ubiquitous, inexpensive infrastructure for secure communication of information among independent entities
- The maturing of XML and related standards to provide a means for easy-to-program, highly extensible, robust exchange of information among information systems
The New HL7 Standard
These IT advances are important enablers, but the most intractable barrier to their use in healthcare has been the lack of standards for exchanging fine-grained, highly heterogeneous, structured clinical data among information systems created by different entities using different technologies. Since its inception in 1987, HL7 Version 2 has enabled information exchange among systems created by different entities. Indeed, Version 2 is so widely used that it will not soon go away and the Board is committed to continuing to evolve it as long as there is a clear need. However, where users have used Version 2 for fine-grained, structured clinical data, they have accomplished it through substantial investments in bilateral negotiations adapting it to establish specifications for representing fine-grained, clinical knowledge. Efforts to aggregate on a larger scale, for research or public health have had the same issue.The strength of Version 3 messaging is precisely enabling the exchange of fine-grained data without the original research and bilateral negotiations that leading-edge organizations have attempted. Furthermore, you will find that we are reaching this in a way that is as future proof as any standards effort can be.
In reading the ballots you will see that the three conceptual models that form the basis of version 3 messages: (1) The Reference Information Model (RIM), which is now an ANSI standard has evolved into a simple abstract framework which addresses the wildly heterogeneous and interlinked nature of clinical data with only six important classes. We have similarly simplified the representation of administrative data. (2) In the Domain Information Model (D-MIM) you will see how the abstract RIM is made specific to define the information elements for a domain or specialty area. (3) In the Refined Message Information Model (R-MIM) you will see how the D-MIM is refined to define the information elements of a family of messages. (4) The vocabulary model provides the tools to deal with previously intractable problems of multiple vocabularies across organizational or national boundaries.
The Hierarchical Message Description is a convenient way to organize a mass of details about the contents of specific messages, providing the most authoritative list of all the constraints and detailed semantic definitions not appropriate in the more abstract representations. Finally, in the Implementable Technology Specification you will see how this information is represented as XML Schemas.
These deliverables are the basis of our belief that the Version 3 Messaging standards will be easily extended over time to incorporate new standards, deal with unanticipated requirements and even address areas of standardization other than application-to-application messages.
XML
We have demonstrated the flexibility of this approach by incorporating an important new technology, XML, in mid project without revising our modeling methodology or content. We believe you will find XML a primary value in Version 3. Its transparent representation of complex data and its extensibility is creating widespread acceptance throughout the IT industry. It is the basis of an expansion in the market of middle-ware vendors providing support for application-to-application integration. While version 2.x has been adapted to XML, Version 3 fully supports the expressive capability of XML. It generates XML schemas with the logical information relationships and element names that directly relate to the HL7 models -- and hence to the concepts that analysts and programmers will have to grasp to relate Version 3 messages to their own information systems or to use them in new ways for Web browsing, XML repositories, etc.As industries have taken up XML they have come to recognize that it is not a substitute for application level semantic standards. HL7 Version 3 provides that missing ingredient, so that healthcare stakeholders can optimally reach the technological benefits of XML.
Your Comments Please
In short, we believe that your review will show that HL7 Version 3 Messaging brings interoperability to a level of clinical knowledge not previously possible. This is one of the important ingredients of IT solutions to improving healthcare processes, by "smarter" bilateral user interfaces, care-giving and management decision support, evidence-based medicine and data-based policy.Please contribute your part by giving us a thorough, honest review. Be blunt. The Board thanks you, your fellow members will thank you, and most important, the volunteers who have given so much of their recent lives to making this happen will be grateful for the recognition and meaningful feedback.