|
HL7 Working Group Meeting:
An Experience in Social Networking
In the early meetings of HL7, the attendees met together—there
were no breakouts. Soon, however, the amount of work to be
accomplished and the interests of the participants resulted in
simultaneous meetings focused mainly on orders (mostly lab);
demographics and administration; and structure and form. Even
so, agendas were arranged so that key topics could be discussed by
all attendees without conflict.
Over the years, the number of "independent" work groups increased,
seemingly without limit. There were some communications among
groups, but the work was largely focused on specific areas. As HL7
continued to grow in both numbers and interests, the number of
technical committees and special interest groups grew as well. The
groups met independently, but the necessity of having joint sessions
became obvious. At a typical HL7 Working Group Meeting today,
well over one-third of the meetings are joint meetings among two
or more work groups. When it is not always clear where specific
work needs to be done, there is unfortunately also overlapping and
redundancy in work. It was, and still is, difficult to be aware of
all the work underway in HL7. Charlie McCay and the Technical
Steering Committee have started a TSC Newsletter that should
improve communications among the work groups. Projects and
project teams have been introduced in an attempt to focus the work
on specific areas and topics rather than on a specific work group.
As the need for enhanced communication among participants
increased, HL7 implemented new methods for sharing information.
Among the first methods were out-of-cycle meetings and list
servers. Conference calls range from weekly in some groups to
monthly in others. More recently, wikis, webinars, and other
social networking technologies have increased the ease of staying
in touch and in doing productive and informed work. Recently,
there were discussions of HL7 having "virtual" meetings. Such
meetings would likely save money and perhaps time. Travel and
hotel costs would be avoided. However, what would we be missing?
Well, think about a typical Working Group Meeting. How often
is there the need to grab someone in a hall conversation to obtain
some information? Morning and afternoon breaks often provide
critical communication opportunities—some planned and some
happenstance. The Neotool party, the Wednesday reception, the
dinners with a pickup group, the gatherings at the bar for that last
beer—to me, that is what social networking is all about. Technology
is great, but it just can’t beat the face-to-face meeting.

W. Ed Hammond, Ph.D.
Chairman of the Board, Health Level Seven, Inc®
|