Implementation

Home | Overview | Meeting Minutes | Documents/Presentations | Projects | Merged with Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing

Below is a list of the current projects this work group is sponsoring. Visit Project Insight to see the full project details. Visit the searchable project database to find projects sponsored by other work groups.

1-8 of 8
Page: 1
Num Name
Sponsor(s)/
Co-Sponsor(s)
 Description Project Facilitator
SD
Approval
Date
TSC
Approval
Date
Status
874
 V2 code table versioning and alignment to V3 vocabulary model Sponsor(s):
Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing Work Group

Co-Sponsor(s):
Vocabulary Work Group 		The scope of this project is to review all code tables that have ever existed in the published HL7 V2. x standard and identify the type of V3 terminology model component (concept domain, value set, or code system) that is associated with each code table. I. . . Frank Oemig Feb 28, 2012 Mar 12, 2012 Active Project (Resources assigned to pjt)
825
 V2 XML Encoding Rules release 2 Sponsor(s):
Implementable Technology Specifications Work Group

Co-Sponsor(s):
Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing Work Group 		This standard describes the rules for the encoding of HL7 v2. x messages in XML for transmission. Frank Oemig Oct 31, 2011 Nov 7, 2011 Normative - Notify
793
 V2. 7. 1 Sponsor(s):
Orders and Observations Work Group

Co-Sponsor(s):
Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing Work Group, Publishing Work Group 		The scope of the project is to include new fields into one or more segments used in the ORU message, address corresponding vocabulary enhancements, and expand the conformance usage indicator definitions. The intent is not to re- publish the entire standard. . . Hans Buitendijk Jul 1, 2011 Jul 11, 2011 Normative - Balloting
763
 HL7 SAIF Implementation Guide Sponsor(s):
Technical Steering Committee

Co-Sponsor(s):
Architectural Review Work Group, Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing Work Group, Electronic Health Records Work Group, Modeling and Methodology Work Group, Orders and Observations Work Group, Services Oriented Architecture Work Group, Structured Documents Work Group 		The project is divided into 3 phases: Phase A: To formally define all of the artifact types that will be developed, maintained and published by HL7 committees under the initial release of the SAIF methodology. This content will form a significant portion . . . Lloyd Mc Kenzie Mar 14, 2011 Mar 21, 2011 Active Project (Resources assigned to pjt)
680
 Neutral Mapping Notation Sponsor(s):
Implementable Technology Specifications Work Group

Co-Sponsor(s):
Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing Work Group 		The aim of the project is to define requirements for a neutral, open notation for expressing semantic mappings; to produce written definitions of one or more candidate notations; to evaluate the candidate notations in projects; then to ballot one or more . . . Robert Worden Jul 6, 2010 Awaiting Approval On Hold
630
 Develop and publish Principles & guidelines to specify the syntax for vocabulary binding in implementation guides Sponsor(s):
Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing Work Group

Co-Sponsor(s):
Vocabulary Work Group 		Develop and publish Principles & guidelines to specify the syntax for vocabulary binding in implementation guides. The intent of this work is to provide guidance for associating value sets (implementable terminology) to Version 3 coded elements and data t. . . Ted Klein; Frank Oemig Feb 2, 2010 Jul 26, 2010 Active Project (Resources assigned to pjt)
629
 V2. 8 Proposals - Improve conformance for better testing Sponsor(s):
Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing Work Group 		ICWG Awaiting Approval Awaiting Approval 3-Year Plan Item
198
 DSTU Testing toolkit/project (Guidance of what is involved in DSTU testing) Sponsor(s):
Conformance & Guidance for Implementation/Testing Work Group 		The HL7 development framework (HDF) provides guidance on how to develop a standard. However, the HDF does not provide guidance on how best to evaluate the standard. Without guidance on how to evaluate a standard it is the burden of each technical committe. . . Jason Rock Apr 2, 2007 Apr 2, 2007 Active Project (Resources assigned to pjt)
1-8 of 8
Page: 1
Click any row to view the details. Click the column headers to sort.